Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
objvsarrayfr
(version: 0)
objvsarray
Comparing performance of:
array vs object
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var user = [{id: '1001', name: 'Octavio', age: 46},{id: '2020', name: 'Mara', age: 39},{id: '3456', name: 'Alanis', age: 12},{id: '9876', name: 'Alondra', age: 10},{id: '6589', name: 'Ariana', age: 7},]; var username = { 1001: "Octavio", 2020: "Mara", 3456: "Alanis", 9876: "Alondra", 6589: "Ariana"}; var userage = { 1001: 46, 2020: 39, 3456: 12, 9876: 10, 6589: 7};
Tests:
array
console.log(user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis').name); console.log(user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis').age);
object
console.log(username[3456]); console.log(userage[3456]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array
object
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing two different approaches to retrieve data from an object: 1. `user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis').name` 2. `username[3456]` **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Array** (`find()` method in the array) 2. **Object** (direct access to a property in the object) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** ### Array (`find()` method) * Pros: + Easier to read and maintain, as it uses a functional programming style. + Can be more flexible if you need to filter multiple conditions. * Cons: + May incur additional overhead due to function invocation and iteration. + Can be slower than direct property access in some cases. ### Object (`username[3456]`) * Pros: + Typically faster, as it directly accesses a property without any overhead. + Can be more efficient for large datasets or when working with a lot of properties. * Cons: + Less readable and maintainable, especially if the object is complex or has many properties. + May lead to issues if the object is not properly initialized or if the property is not found. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmark tests use any libraries. However, it's worth noting that in a real-world scenario, you might be using libraries like Lodash (which provides `find()` and other utility functions) or Ramda (which provides functional programming utilities). **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. The tests are standard JavaScript code. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to these approaches, consider the following: * For direct property access (`username[3456]`), you could use a Map instead of an object if you need to look up values by key. * For filtering data using `find()` (e.g., `user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis')`), you could use other filter functions like `filter()` or even a regular expression. In summary, the benchmark is testing two common approaches to retrieve data from an object: direct property access and filtering using `find()`. The choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your use case.
Related benchmarks:
lodash_array_objects
lodash_array_objects_2
cache variabled
objvsarray
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?