Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Proxy cloneNode or vanila cloneNode or Reflect get
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Proxy cloneNode vs Vanila cloneNode vs Reflect get
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Proxy cloneNode
const tags = new Proxy([ 'div', ].map(v => document.createElement(v)), { get(target, prop, receiver) { return Reflect.get(target, prop).cloneNode(); } }); let list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; list.push(tags[0]); if(n===100000) break; }
Vanila cloneNode
const tags = [ 'div', ].map(v => document.createElement(v)); let list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; list.push(tags[0].cloneNode()); if(n===100000) break; }
Reflect get
const tags = [ 'div', ].map(v => document.createElement(v)); let list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; list.push(Reflect.get(tags, 0).cloneNode()); if(n===100000) break; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Proxy cloneNode
Vanila cloneNode
Reflect get
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by a JSON object that represents three different approaches to cloning elements in JavaScript: `Proxy`, `Vanila` (using the `cloneNode()` method directly), and `Reflect get`. The options being compared are: * **Proxy**: Using a Proxy object to create an intermediate layer between the original element array and the cloned elements. The Proxy object's `get` trap is used to intercept the `cloneNode()` method and return a new clone. * **Vanila**: Using the `cloneNode()` method directly on the individual elements in the array. * **Reflect get**: Using the `Reflect.get()` function to retrieve the first element of the Proxy object and then calling its `cloneNode()` method. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **Proxy**: * Pros: Can provide additional logic or transformation before cloning, allows for more control over the cloning process. * Cons: May introduce additional overhead due to the Proxy object creation and manipulation. * **Vanila**: * Pros: Simple and efficient, doesn't require creating an intermediate layer. * Cons: Doesn't provide any additional logic or transformation before cloning. * **Reflect get**: * Pros: Provides a simple way to retrieve the first element of the Proxy object without creating an unnecessary intermediate layer. * Cons: Requires using the `Reflect.get()` function, which might be less familiar to some developers. **Library and Special JS Features** None of the test cases rely on any specific JavaScript libraries beyond the standard DOM API. However, they do utilize the following special JavaScript features: * **Proxy objects**: Used in the Proxy approach to create an intermediate layer between the original element array and the cloned elements. * **Reflect.get() function**: Used in the Reflect get approach to retrieve the first element of the Proxy object without creating an unnecessary intermediate layer. **Other Alternatives** If you were to implement a similar benchmark, some alternative approaches you could consider include: * Using `Array.prototype.map()` with a callback function that clones each element instead of using `cloneNode()`. * Utilizing `slice()` and `concat()` methods to create a new array containing cloned elements. * Leveraging modern JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or Web Workers for more complex cloning operations. Please note that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and performance requirements. Experimenting with different techniques can help you determine which method is most efficient for your particular application.
Related benchmarks:
Nested proxy creation
Callback vs Proxy apply
Proxy target[key] vs Reflect.get vs get function
Proxy target[key] vs Reflect.get vs get function (fixed)
Proxy target[key] vs Reflect.get vs optional Reflect.get
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?