Benchmark: Nested proxy creation

Script Preparation code:

object = {
    value: {sub: 'data'}
};
proxy = new Proxy(object, {})
handler = {
    get(target, prop, receiver) {
        return new Proxy(Reflect.get(target, prop, receiver), handler)
    },
    set(target, prop, new_value, receiver) {
        return Reflect.set(target, prop, new_value, receiver)
    }
}
proxyWithHandler = new Proxy(object, {
	get(target, prop, receiver) {
    	return Reflect.get(target, prop, receiver)
    }
})
proxyWithHandler2 = new Proxy(object, handler)

Tests:

Direct access
object.value
Proxied access with no get handler
proxy.value
Proxied access with forward get handler
proxyWithHandler.value
Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler
proxyWithHandler2.value
Direct set
object.value = {sub: "data2"}
Proxied set with no set handler
proxy.value = {sub: "data2"}
Proxied set with forward set handler
proxyWithHandler2.value = {sub: "data2"}

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Direct access
Proxied access with no get handler
Proxied access with forward get handler
Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler
Direct set
Proxied set with no set handler
Proxied set with forward set handler

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Direct access

15.2M/s

Proxied access with no get handler

15.0M/s

Direct set

14.8M/s

Proxied access with forward get handler

7.3M/s

Proxied set with no set handler

4.8M/s

Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler

3.8M/s

Proxied set with forward set handler

3.5M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Direct access	15,164,571 Ops/sec
Proxied access with no get handler	14,955,357 Ops/sec
Direct set	14,766,445 Ops/sec
Proxied access with forward get handler	7,322,598 Ops/sec
Proxied set with no set handler	4,803,566 Ops/sec
Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler	3,816,207 Ops/sec
Proxied set with forward set handler	3,491,174 Ops/sec

Nested proxy creation (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Direct access vs Proxied access with no get handler vs Proxied access with forward get handler vs Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler vs Direct set vs Proxied set with no set handler vs Proxied set with forward set handler`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Direct access

Proxied access with no get handler

Proxied access with forward get handler

Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler

Direct set

Proxied set with no set handler

Proxied set with forward set handler

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Nested proxy creation (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Direct access vs Proxied access with no get handler vs Proxied access with forward get handler vs Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler vs Direct set vs Proxied set with no set handler vs Proxied set with forward set handler

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Direct access

Proxied access with no get handler

Proxied access with forward get handler

Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler

Direct set

Proxied set with no set handler

Proxied set with forward set handler

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Direct access vs Proxied access with no get handler vs Proxied access with forward get handler vs Proxied access with proxy wrapping get handler vs Direct set vs Proxied set with no set handler vs Proxied set with forward set handler`