Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
r v s bench
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
regex replace all vs split filter join
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
regex replace all
const term1 = 'The quick brown fox'; const regex = /[ ]{2,}/gi; const term2 = term1.replaceAll(regex, " ");
split filter join
const term1 = 'The quick brown fox'; const term2 = term1.split(' ').filter(el => el.length > 1).join(' ');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
regex replace all
split filter join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** MeasureThat.net is a platform for testing JavaScript microbenchmarks, allowing users to compare the performance of different approaches in various scenarios. The provided JSON represents two individual test cases. The first test case, "regex replace all," tests the performance of regular expressions (regex) with the `replaceAll` method. Here's what's being tested: * A string (`term1`) is defined with multiple consecutive spaces. * A regex pattern (`/[ ]{2,}/gi`) is created to match two or more consecutive spaces. * The `replaceAll` method is used to replace all occurrences of this regex pattern with a single space. The second test case, "split filter join," tests the performance of string manipulation using the following steps: 1. A string (`term1`) is defined with multiple words separated by spaces. 2. The string is split into an array of words using the `split` method. 3. An array filter is applied to remove words with a length less than or equal to 1. 4. The remaining words are joined back into a string using the `join` method. **Comparison Options** The provided test cases demonstrate two different approaches: 1. **Regex-based approach**: Using regular expressions with the `replaceAll` method to replace all occurrences of consecutive spaces. 2. **String manipulation approach**: Splitting, filtering, and joining strings to remove words with a specific length criteria. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * Regex-based approach: + Pros: - More concise and readable code - Can handle complex pattern matching + Cons: - May be slower due to the overhead of regular expression processing - Requires proper regex syntax and handling edge cases * String manipulation approach: + Pros: - Typically faster than regex-based approaches - More straightforward and easier to understand + Cons: - Requires multiple steps, which can increase complexity - May be less concise than regex-based approaches **Library Usage** None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. The regex pattern is a built-in JavaScript feature. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The `replaceAll` method and the `split`, `filter`, and `join` methods are standard JavaScript features, but they may have variations depending on the browser or environment used. Additionally, the `gi` flag in the regex pattern indicates case-insensitive matching with global flags. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for string manipulation could include: 1. Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js for more functional programming styles. 2. Employing more specialized libraries like regex-optimization tools or string processing utilities. 3. Exploring alternative data structures, such as arrays or objects, to optimize string manipulation. However, for simple use cases like the provided test cases, JavaScript's built-in features and standard library should suffice. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The `Script Preparation Code` field is empty, which means that no additional code needs to be executed before running the benchmark. The `Html Preparation Code` field is also empty, indicating that no HTML preparation is required for this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash find
test obj vs for
Map iteration for vs while cached
sma - doc or new
for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?