Benchmark: for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {
  a: 1,
  b: 1,
  c: 1,
  d: 1,
  e: 1,
  f: 1,
  g: 1,
  h: 1,
  i: 1,
  j: 1,
  k: 1,
  l: 1,
  m: 1,
  n: 1,
  o: 1,
  p: 1,
  q: 1,
  r: 1,
  s: 1,
  t: 1,
  u: 1,
  v: 1,
  w: 1,
  x: 1,
  y: 1,
  z: 1
};

Tests:

for-in Object.hasOwn
for (let i = 10000; i > 0; i--) { for (const key in obj) { if (!Object.hasOwn(obj, key)) { continue } console.log(key); } }
for-of Object.keys
for (let i = 10000; i > 0; i--) { for (const key of Object.keys(obj)) { console.log(key) } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for-in Object.hasOwn
for-of Object.keys

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 131 on Android

View result in a separate tab

for-in Object.hasOwn

0/s

for-of Object.keys

0/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ for-in Object.hasOwn	0 Ops/sec
for-of Object.keys	0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two approaches for iterating over an object's properties: `Object.hasOwn` (an older method) versus `for...of` with `Object.keys()` (a modern method).

**What is being tested?**

In this specific benchmark, the test cases iterate over a large object (`obj`) and log each key to the console. The difference between the two approaches lies in how they access the object's properties.

**Options compared:**

1. **`Object.hasOwn(obj, key)`**: This method checks if an object has a property with the given `key`. It returns `true` if the property exists and is not inherited from the prototype chain.
2. **For...of loop with `Object.keys()`**: This approach uses the `Object.keys()` method to get an array of the object's property names, and then iterates over this array using a for...of loop.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **`Object.hasOwn`:**
	+ Pros:
		- Can be faster for smaller objects or when iterating over a subset of properties.
		- More readable code, as it explicitly checks for property existence.
	+ Cons:
		- Can be slower for large objects due to the overhead of method calls and property lookup.
		- May not be as efficient when iterating over inherited properties.
* **For...of loop with `Object.keys()`:**
	+ Pros:
		- Generally faster and more efficient, especially for large objects.
		- Simplifies code by avoiding explicit property checks.
	+ Cons:
		- Less readable code, as it relies on the internal implementation of `Object.keys()`.
		- May not work correctly if the object has non-enumerable properties.

**Other considerations:**

* **Iteration order**: The for...of loop with `Object.keys()` is generally more predictable and consistent in its iteration order compared to `Object.hasOwn`, which can return a subset of properties.
* **Memory usage**: Both approaches have similar memory usage, as they only store the object's property names.

**Library/dependencies:**

None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that `Object.keys()` is a built-in method and does not rely on any external libraries.

No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these test cases.

**Other alternatives:**

* For iterating over an object's properties, other approaches could include:
	+ Using a for...in loop with the `in` operator (less efficient than `Object.keys()`).
	+ Using the `for...of` loop with an array of property names (more efficient than using `Object.keys()`, but may require manual property name generation).
	+ Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js, which provide various utility functions for working with objects and arrays.

for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys`

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

for-in Object.hasOwn

for-of Object.keys

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

for-in Object.hasOwn

for-of Object.keys

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `for-in Object.hasOwn vs for-of Object.keys`