Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Logical vs Math Minus in sort return (number value)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Logical vs Math Minus
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var objs = [ { first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' , pid: 4}, { first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' , pid: 7}, { first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' , pid: 1} ];
Tests:
Logical
objs.sort((a,b) => (a.pid > b.pid) ? 1 : -1);
Math Minus
objs.sort((a,b) => (a.pid - b.pid));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Logical
Math Minus
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a script that creates an array of objects (`objs`) with various properties, including `pid`. The script then defines two different sorting functions: 1. **Logical**: `(a,b) => (a.pid > b.pid) ? 1 : -1` 2. **Math Minus**: `(a,b) => (a.pid - b.pid)` The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of these two sorting approaches. **Comparison Options** There are two options being compared: 1. **Logical Sort**: Uses a conditional statement (`if-else` clause) to determine the order of elements based on their `pid` property. 2. **Math Minus Sort**: Uses the `-` operator to subtract `b.pid` from `a.pid`, effectively performing an arithmetic comparison. **Pros and Cons** * **Logical Sort**: + Pros: Can be more readable and easier to understand, especially for developers familiar with JavaScript's conditional statements. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the `if-else` clause and potential branching in the CPU. * **Math Minus Sort**: + Pros: Often faster and more efficient, as it uses a simple arithmetic operation that can be optimized by the CPU. + Cons: May be less readable and harder to understand for developers unfamiliar with this approach. **Library and Special JS Features** There is no specific library used in this benchmark. The `sort()` method is a built-in JavaScript function, which means it doesn't rely on any external libraries. No special JavaScript features are being tested or utilized in this benchmark. It's focused solely on the performance comparison of two sorting approaches using native JavaScript functions. **Other Alternatives** If you were to implement this benchmark yourself, you could consider adding additional test cases to compare other sorting algorithms, such as: * **Quicksort**: A popular sorting algorithm that uses a divide-and-conquer approach. * **Merge Sort**: Another efficient sorting algorithm that uses a merge-and-compare approach. * **Heap Sort**: A comparison-based sorting algorithm that uses a heap data structure. You could also explore testing different optimization techniques, such as: * Using `Object.entries()` or other array methods to improve readability and performance. * Comparing the results of using `sort()` with and without the `stable` option. * Testing the performance of sorting algorithms on larger datasets or more complex input structures.
Related benchmarks:
Bitwise, Bitwise not, and Math floor
Abs vs ternary to find difference between two number
Negate Number
Negatives
Number constructor vs naive compare
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?