Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Abs vs ternary to find difference between two number
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
abs vs ternary
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var one = 5 var two = 2
Tests:
abs
var a = Math.abs(two - one)
ternary
var a = two > one ? two - one : one - two
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
abs
ternary
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 121 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
abs
902.7M/s
ternary
840.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
abs
902,704,576 Ops/sec
ternary
840,340,672 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark test case. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests two different approaches to find the absolute difference between two numbers: `Math.abs(two - one)` and `(two > one ? two - one : one - two)`. The first approach uses the built-in `Math.abs()` function, while the second approach uses a ternary operator (a shorthand if-else statement). **What options are compared?** We're comparing two different implementations to find the absolute difference between two numbers: 1. Using `Math.abs()`: This is a straightforward and efficient way to get the absolute value of a number. 2. Using a ternary operator: This approach uses a concise syntax to achieve the same result as the first one. **Pros/Cons of each approach** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Math.abs()**: * Pros: Easy to read, understand, and maintain. Efficient and widely supported. * Cons: May be slower than a ternary operator in very performance-critical code. 2. **Ternary operator**: * Pros: Concise syntax can make code more readable and easier to write. Can be faster in some cases due to the reduced number of operations. * Cons: Can be harder to read and understand, especially for developers not familiar with this syntax. **Other considerations** When deciding which approach to use, consider the following factors: 1. Code readability and maintainability: If you're writing code that will be maintained by others or yourself in the future, using `Math.abs()` might be a better choice. 2. Performance-critical code: If you're working on very performance-sensitive code, the ternary operator approach might be faster. 3. Personal preference: Ultimately, choose the approach that makes your code easier to understand and maintain. **Library and special JS features** In this case, no external libraries or special JavaScript features are used. The test simply compares two different implementation approaches using standard JavaScript syntax. **Alternatives** If you need to find the absolute difference between two numbers, consider the following alternatives: 1. Using `Math.abs()` (as in the first approach). 2. Using the `Math.abs()` function with a more concise syntax: `Math.abs(one - two)`. 3. If you're using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js, you can use their respective implementations of absolute difference functions. That's it! I hope this explanation helps software engineers understand the benchmark test case and make informed decisions about which approach to use in their code.
Related benchmarks
floor vs trunc vs bit shift
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operatorsd
ParseInt vs conditional ~~
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?