Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operator #2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var number = Math.random() * 1000;
Tests:
Math.max/min
return Math.max(250, Math.min(750, number));
if
if(number < 250) return 250; if(number > 750) return 750; return number;
ternary
return number < 250 ? 250 : (number > 750 ? 750 : number);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math.max/min
if
ternary
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches to find the maximum or minimum value between two numbers: using `if` statements, ternary operators (`ternary`), and `Math.max()`/`Math.min()` functions. **Approaches Compared** 1. **If Statements**: This approach uses an `if-else` statement to check if the input number is less than 250 or greater than 750, and returns either 250 or 750 accordingly. 2. **Ternary Operator (ternary)**: This approach uses a ternary operator to concisely express the same logic as the `if` statements, with three conditions that evaluate to different values based on the input number. 3. **Math.max() / Math.min() Functions**: This approach uses built-in JavaScript functions to find the maximum or minimum value between two numbers. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **If Statements** * Pros: Easy to understand, readable code. * Cons: May lead to longer execution times due to the overhead of conditional checks. 2. **Ternary Operator (ternary)** * Pros: Concise, efficient code that can be faster than `if` statements. * Cons: May require additional mental effort to understand and maintain. 3. **Math.max() / Math.min() Functions** * Pros: Built-in functions are optimized for performance and provide a concise way to solve the problem. * Cons: Requires knowledge of built-in functions, which may not be familiar to all developers. **Library Used** None. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None mentioned in the benchmark definition. **Benchmark Preparation Code Explanation** The preparation code `var number = Math.random() * 1000;` generates a random integer value between 0 and 1000 for each test case, which is used to evaluate the performance of each approach. **Other Alternatives** 1. **Using `Math.max()`/`Math.min()` with two arguments**: This approach uses both functions to find the maximum or minimum value between two numbers in a single statement. For example: `return Math.max(number, 250);` 2. **Using bitwise operations**: This approach uses bitwise operators to find the maximum or minimum value between two numbers without using built-in functions. For example: `(number + 750) > number ? 750 : number` Note that these alternative approaches are not included in the provided benchmark definition and would require additional test cases to measure their performance.
Related benchmarks:
simple Math.max vs ternary
Math.max/min vs function ternary vs inline ternary
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operator 232323
Math.Max() vs Ternary
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operatorsd
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?