Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Jquery Vs VanillaJS
(version: 0)
Benchmark.js
Comparing performance of:
Jquery vs Vanilla JS
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js'></script> <div id='test' data-count="0"></div>
Tests:
Jquery
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { $('#test').text("actual count value is : "+$('#test').data('count')); $('#test').data('count', +$('#test').data('count')+1); }
Vanilla JS
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { document.querySelector('#test').innerText = "actual count value is : "+document.querySelector('#test').dataset.count; document.querySelector('#test').dataset.count = +document.querySelector('#test').dataset.count+1; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Jquery
Vanilla JS
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
4 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome Mobile 144 on Android
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=628389" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Vanilla JS
4K/s
Jquery
4K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Vanilla JS
4,430 Ops/sec
Jquery
3,642 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test comparing the performance of jQuery and VanillaJS (JavaScript's built-in functionality) in incrementing a counter value 10 times. **What is being tested?** In both test cases, the code increments a counter stored in an HTML element with the id "test" using either jQuery or VanillaJS. The benchmark measures how many executions per second each approach can perform. **Options compared:** 1. **jQuery**: Uses jQuery's `$('#test').text()` and `$('#test').data('count')` methods to manipulate the counter value. 2. **VanillaJS**: Uses HTML element properties like `innerText` and `dataset` to achieve similar functionality without any external libraries. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **jQuery**: + Pros: - Faster lookup and manipulation of elements using jQuery's DOM manipulation API. - More convenient syntax for accessing and modifying the counter value. + Cons: - Requires an additional HTTP request to load the jQuery library, which may introduce overhead. - May have a larger footprint due to the added library size. * **VanillaJS**: + Pros: - No additional HTTP requests or library dependencies. - Smaller footprint and potentially better performance since it doesn't rely on an external library. + Cons: - More verbose syntax for accessing and modifying the counter value. - Requires manual DOM manipulation, which can be error-prone. **Library usage** In this benchmark, jQuery is used to access and manipulate HTML elements. Specifically, it uses `$('#test').text()` and `$('#test').data('count')` methods to get and set the counter value. The `dataset` property in VanillaJS achieves similar functionality without relying on an external library. **Special JS features or syntax** None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, note that VanillaJS relies on the `dataset` property, which is a part of HTML5 specifications but not supported by all browsers. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries or approaches to incrementing counters: * **React Hooks**: Instead of using jQuery or VanillaJS directly, you could use React Hooks (e.g., `useState`) to manage state changes. * **Redux**: For larger applications, Redux or another state management library might be used instead of direct manipulation of DOM elements. * **Alternative libraries**: Libraries like Lodash or Ramda provide higher-order functions for manipulating data and may offer performance benefits in certain scenarios. Keep in mind that these alternatives are not directly comparable to the jQuery/VanillaJS trade-off in this specific benchmark.
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?