Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Jquery Vs VanillaJS + specifying ID/class
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Jquery vs Vanilla JS vs Vanilla JS specifying ID/class
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js'></script> <div id='test' data-count="0"></div>
Tests:
Jquery
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { $('#test').text("actual count value is : "+$('#test').data('count')); $('#test').data('count', +$('#test').data('count')+1); }
Vanilla JS
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { document.querySelector('#test').innerText = "actual count value is : "+document.querySelector('#test').dataset.count; document.querySelector('#test').dataset.count = +document.querySelector('#test').dataset.count+1; }
Vanilla JS specifying ID/class
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { document.getElementById('test').innerText = "actual count value is : "+document.getElementById('test').dataset.count; document.getElementById('test').dataset.count = +document.getElementById('test').dataset.count+1; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Jquery
Vanilla JS
Vanilla JS specifying ID/class
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, the different approaches compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing three different JavaScript approaches to increment a counter value in a HTML element: 1. **JQuery**: Uses the jQuery library to access and update the `data-count` attribute of an HTML element. 2. **Vanilla JS**: Uses native JavaScript methods (e.g., `document.querySelector()`, `innerText`) to access and update the same `data-count` attribute. 3. **Vanilla JS specifying ID/class**: Similar to Vanilla JS, but uses `document.getElementById()` and `innerText` instead of `querySelector()`. **Options compared:** * jQuery library vs native JavaScript methods * Using an ID vs using a class selector **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **JQuery**: * Pros: + Easier to access and update attributes with the `$()` function. + Can be more convenient for complex DOM manipulations. * Cons: + Adds an additional library dependency, increasing bundle size. + May have performance overhead due to the additional library. 2. **Vanilla JS**: * Pros: + No additional library dependency, reducing bundle size. + Native methods may be faster and more efficient. * Cons: + Requires manual DOM manipulation, which can be error-prone. + May require more code to achieve the same result as jQuery. 3. **Vanilla JS specifying ID/class**: * Pros: + Combines the benefits of native methods with the convenience of using an ID. * Cons: + Still requires manual DOM manipulation, and may have performance overhead. **Library used:** In this benchmark, jQuery is used as a library to access and update attributes. The `data-count` attribute is set on the HTML element, and jQuery's `$()` function is used to dynamically update its value. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark, such as ES6 modules, async/await, or Promises. **Other considerations:** * **Browser performance:** The benchmark results show that Chrome 88 performs better for Vanilla JS specifying ID/class (657.6325073242188 executions per second) compared to the other two approaches. * **Library dependency:** Using jQuery introduces an additional library dependency, which may impact bundle size and performance. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives to test these benchmarks could include: * Testing with different browsers or browser versions * Adding more complex DOM manipulations or calculations to the benchmark * Comparing the results of using different attribute names (e.g., `data-attribute` instead of `data-count`) * Using different HTML structures or element selectors.
Related benchmarks:
Jquery Vs VanillaJS + specifying ID/class with count
Jquery Vs VanillaJS + specifying ID/class with count without reset
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID Selector / JQuery
jQuery 3.6.0 vs Vanilla JS
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID Selector test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?