Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
reverse
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
temp swap vs xor swap vs inbuilt vs manual rvers
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
temp swap
let arr = [1,4,6] let len = arr.length let temp = 0 for(let i=0; i<Math.floor(arr.length/2); i++){ let x = i let y = len-1-i temp = arr[x] arr[x] = arr[y] arr[y] = temp } console.log(arr)
xor swap
let arr = [1,4,6] let len = arr.length for(let i=0; i<Math.floor(arr.length/2); i++){ let x = i let y = len-1-i arr[x] = arr[x] ^ arr[y] arr[y] = arr[x] ^ arr[y] arr[x] = arr[x] ^ arr[y] } console.log(arr)
inbuilt
let arr= [1,2,3] arr.reverse()
manual rvers
let arr=[1,2,3], res =[] for(let i=arr.length-1; i>=0; i--) { res = arr[i] } console.log(res)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
temp swap
xor swap
inbuilt
manual rvers
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its various components. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, which is a test designed to measure the performance of specific code snippets. The benchmark definition includes the following elements: * `Name`: A unique name for the benchmark, in this case, "reverse". * `Description`: An optional description of the benchmark, but none is provided. * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These are empty strings, indicating that no specific code needs to be executed before running the benchmark. This might be used if the benchmark only requires a minimal setup. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of four test cases: 1. **temp swap**: This test case involves swapping elements in an array using a temporary variable. 2. **xor swap**: Similar to the first test case, but uses bitwise XOR operations to swap elements. 3. **inbuilt**: This test case uses the built-in `reverse()` method of arrays to reverse their order. 4. **manual rvers**: This test case reverses an array manually by iterating over its elements and appending them in reverse order. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares four different approaches for reversing an array: 1. **temp swap**: Uses a temporary variable to swap elements in the array. 2. **xor swap**: Utilizes bitwise XOR operations to achieve element swapping. 3. **inbuilt**: Leverages the built-in `reverse()` method provided by JavaScript engines. 4. **manual rvers**: Implements a manual reversal approach using iteration and concatenation. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: * **temp swap**: Pros: Simple, well-known algorithm. Cons: Requires extra memory for the temporary variable and can lead to cache locality issues. * **xor swap**: Pros: Can be more efficient in terms of cache access patterns due to its bitwise nature. Cons: May require additional cycles due to the XOR operations, and some CPU architectures may not support XOR swaps. * **inbuilt**: Pros: Fastest implementation, optimized by JavaScript engines. Cons: Not a traditional "algorithm" but rather an inherent feature of JavaScript. * **manual rvers**: Pros: Can be more predictable and cache-friendly than other approaches. Cons: More complex to implement and may require more iterations due to the manual reversal. **Library Usage** None of the test cases explicitly use any external libraries, but they do rely on built-in JavaScript methods like `reverse()`. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no notable special features or syntax used in these benchmarks, except for the use of bitwise XOR operations (`^`) in the `xor swap` approach. This is a basic operation in many programming languages and is not unique to JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you were looking for alternative approaches to reverse an array, some possible options could be: * Using a recursive function * Implementing a linked list reversal algorithm * Utilizing assembly language or low-level optimizations (not recommended due to platform and compiler dependencies) * Leveraging parallel processing or multi-threading techniques (if available) Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely have different performance characteristics, trade-offs, and complexity levels. I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its various components!
Related benchmarks:
reverse number
Reverse a number
String double reverse
Immutable reverse
Replace_12211fd
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?