Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
reverse number
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
math way vs string way
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
math way
var n = 1234567890987654; var len = Math.ceil(Math.log(n+1) / Math.LN10); var result = 0; while(len>0){ result=result*10; result = Math.floor(result+n%10); n=n/10; len -- }
string way
var n = 1234567890987654321; var reversed = n.toString().split('').reverse().join(''); Number(reversed)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
math way
string way
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** Two different approaches are being compared to reverse a 19-digit number: the "math way" and the "string way". 1. **Math Way**: This approach uses mathematical operations to extract the individual digits from the original number, reverses them, and then converts the result back to an integer. The code snippet shows how this is done. 2. **String Way**: This approach uses string manipulation functions to split the input number into individual characters (digits), reverse the order of these characters, and then convert the resulting string back to an integer. **Options compared** The two approaches are being compared in terms of performance (speed) on a specific test case: reversing a 19-digit number. **Pros and Cons** **Math Way:** Pros: * This approach is likely to be faster since it avoids the overhead of string manipulation functions. * It's a more traditional, language-agnostic way to reverse numbers. Cons: * Requires manual handling of integer arithmetic, which can be error-prone. * May not work correctly for very large numbers due to integer overflow issues. **String Way:** Pros: * Easier to implement and less prone to errors compared to the math way. * Works correctly for large numbers since string manipulation functions don't have the same limitations as integer arithmetic. Cons: * This approach is slower due to the overhead of string creation, splitting, reversing, and conversion back to an integer. * Requires access to the `split()`, `reverse()`, and `join()` string methods, which may not be available in all environments. **Library/Feature usage** The `Math.LN10` constant is used in the math way to calculate the logarithm base 10 of the number. This constant is part of the JavaScript Math library, providing a convenient way to work with logarithmic values. No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested here. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to test these approaches with different libraries or frameworks, you could consider using: * A more advanced data processing library like `lodash` for the string way. * A dedicated numerical computation library like `numjs` for the math way. * A different programming language that has built-in support for efficient integer arithmetic. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches will likely be small, and other factors like code organization, readability, and maintainability should also be considered when implementing benchmarks.
Related benchmarks:
reverse number
Reverse a number
Space numbers every 3 digits
Spacing numbers every 3 digits
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?