Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
verify vs verifyShort
(version: 0)
verify
Comparing performance of:
verify vs verifyShort
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
verify
function verify([...str]){ let prev=0; for(let i=0; i<str.length; i++){ let prevStep=prev; const curr=str[i]; ((curr==='('&&prevStep++||curr===')'&&prevStep--))&& ((curr==='{'&&prevStep++||curr==='}'&&prevStep--))&& ((curr==='['&&prevStep++||curr===']'&&prevStep--)); prev=prevStep; if(prev!==0) break; } return prev===0; } console.log(verify("[()]{}{[()()]()}")); console.log(verify("[{()()}({[]})]({}[({})])((((((()[])){}))[]{{{({({({{{{{{}}}}}})})})}}}))[][][]")); console.log(verify("({(()))}}"));
verifyShort
function verifyShort([...str]) {return str.reduce((uptoPrevChar, thisChar) => { ((thisChar === '(' && uptoPrevChar++ || thisChar === ')' && uptoPrevChar--)) && ((thisChar === '{' && uptoPrevChar++ || thisChar === '}' && uptoPrevChar--)) && ((thisChar === '[' && uptoPrevChar++ || thisChar === ']' && uptoPrevChar--)); return uptoPrevChar; }, 0) === 0 } console.log(verifyShort("[()]{}{[()()]()}")); console.log(verifyShort("[{()()}({[]})]({}[({})])((((((()[])){}))[]{{{({({({{{{{{}}}}}})})})}}}))[][][]")); console.log(verifyShort("({(()))}}"));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
verify
verifyShort
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents two benchmark definitions: `verify` and `verifyShort`. These benchmarks test the performance of a function that verifies whether a string represents a valid syntax for a programming language ( likely JSON). **Options Compared** The `verify` and `verifyShort` benchmarks compare the performance of two different approaches: 1. **`verify`**: This benchmark uses a traditional loop-based approach to iterate through the input string, checking each character's validity. 2. **`verifyShort`**: This benchmark uses the `reduce()` method to accumulate the "step" values while iterating through the input string. **Pros and Cons** **`verify`**: Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Can be optimized for specific use cases (e.g., using a more efficient data structure) Cons: * Inefficient due to the use of explicit loops and conditional statements **`verifyShort`**: Pros: * More concise and easier to read than the `verify` implementation * Uses a built-in array method (`reduce()`) that can be optimized by the JavaScript engine Cons: * May have performance overhead due to the creation of an intermediate array **Other Considerations** Both benchmarks rely on the fact that the input strings represent valid JSON syntax. The tests also assume that the input strings will not contain any special JavaScript features or syntax. **Library and Purpose** The `reduce()` method is a built-in JavaScript function that applies a reduction operation to an accumulator array, accumulating values from each element in the array. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmarks. The input strings only contain characters commonly found in JSON data (i.e., parentheses, brackets, and curly braces). **Alternatives** If you wanted to write a benchmark for a similar problem, you could consider the following alternatives: * Use a different data structure (e.g., a stack or queue) instead of an array to accumulate the "step" values. * Implement the `verify` function using a regular expression-based approach, which can be more efficient than explicit loops. * Create benchmarks for other JSON-related problems, such as parsing or serialization. Keep in mind that the choice of algorithm and implementation depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Math.pow(x,0.25) vs Math.sqrt(sqrt(x))
parseInt-vs-math.floor
Math.round vs Bitwise
Math.round vs Number.isInteger
Number.isInteger() vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?