Benchmark: CleanUpFontFamilyStyles optimization - no jquery

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://publicstatic.tableausoftware.com/vizql/v_100001608191615/javascripts/mscorlib.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2186277/vqlui.debug3.js"></script>

<div id="testRoot">
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
</div>

<div id="testRoot2">
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

$("#testRoot span").css("font-family", "'Benton Sans Condensed Regular'");
$("#testRoot2 span").css("font-family", "'Benton Sans Condensed Regular'");

Tests:

Test 1
tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles($("#testRoot"))
Optimized
tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2($("#testRoot2"))
with getComputedStyle dupe
tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2($("#testRoot2"))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Test 1
Optimized
with getComputedStyle dupe

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance of the `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles` function, which is part of the `FormattingConverters` library (more on this later). The function takes a DOM element as an argument and optimizes its font family styles.

**Options Compared**

There are three test cases:

1. **Test 1**: This is the original implementation of `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles`.
2. **Optimized**: This version uses an optimized implementation of `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles`, which likely applies the necessary optimizations to improve performance.
3. **with getComputedStyle dupe**: This test case is a duplicate of the previous one, but with the addition of calling `getComputedStyle` on the DOM element before passing it to `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles`. The purpose of this test is unclear, as `getComputedStyle` is already used in the original implementation.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

1. **Original Implementation (Test 1)**:
	* Pros: May be simpler to implement and understand.
	* Cons: Might not apply necessary optimizations for better performance.
2. **Optimized Implementation (Optimized)**:
	* Pros: Likely applies optimized techniques to improve performance, making it faster than the original implementation.
	* Cons: May introduce additional complexity or overhead during development.
3. **with getComputedStyle dupe**:
	* Pros: None apparent.
	* Cons: The purpose of this test is unclear, and it may be a duplicate of the previous test.

**Library: FormattingConverters**

The `FormattingConverters` library provides utility functions for formatting and optimizing CSS styles in web applications. In this case, `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles` is used to optimize font family styles on a DOM element.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax (Not Applicable)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If the `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles` function were to be implemented differently, alternative approaches might include:

1. Using CSS preprocessors like Sass or Less to optimize font family styles.
2. Implementing a custom optimization algorithm for font family styles.
3. Using existing libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality.

Keep in mind that these alternatives are speculative and would depend on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.

In summary, this benchmark measures the performance of the `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles` function from the `FormattingConverters` library, comparing three different test cases: the original implementation, an optimized version, and a duplicate with the addition of `getComputedStyle`. The goal is to identify which implementation is faster and more efficient.

Related benchmarks:

CleanUpFontFamilyStyles optimization - no jquery (version: 3)

Comparing performance of: Test 1 vs Optimized vs with getComputedStyle dupe

Created: 9 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Test 1

Optimized

with getComputedStyle dupe

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):