Benchmark: CleanUpFontFamilyStyles optimization - use external js file

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://publicstatic.tableausoftware.com/vizql/v_100001608191615/javascripts/mscorlib.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2186277/vqlui.debug.js"></script>

<div id="testRoot">
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
</div>

<div id="testRoot2">
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
  <span>1</span>
</div>

Tests:

Test 1
tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles($("#testRoot"))
Optimized
tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2($("#testRoot2"))
with getComputedStyle dupe
tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2($("#testRoot2"))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Test 1
Optimized
with getComputedStyle dupe

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The benchmark definition includes:

* A script that loads two external JavaScript files: `microsoftorio.js` and `vqlui.debug.js`.
* An HTML snippet with two `<div>` elements, `#testRoot` and `#testRoot2`, each containing six `<span>` elements.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are three test cases:

1. **Test 1**: The benchmark definition is `tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles($(\"#testRoot\"))`. This script calls a function named `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles` from the `FormattingConverters` object, passing the `#testRoot` element as an argument.
2. **Optimized**: The benchmark definition is `tab.FormattingConverters.cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2($(\"#testRoot2\"))`. This script calls a similar function to the previous one, but with a different name (`cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2`) and passing the `#testRoot2` element as an argument.
3. **with getComputedStyle dupe**: The benchmark definition is identical to the Optimized test case.

**Libraries and Special Features**

* `FormattingConverters`: A custom object that provides utility functions for formatting and converting values. This object is likely part of a larger library or framework, but its exact purpose is not clear without more context.
* `getComputedStyle`: A built-in JavaScript function that retrieves the computed style of an element.

**Options Compared**

The three test cases differ in the way they call the `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles`/`cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2` functions:

1. **Test 1**: Uses the original function name and passes the `#testRoot` element directly.
2. **Optimized**: Uses a similar function name (`cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2`) but with a different implementation (not shown in the benchmark definition).
3. **with getComputedStyle dupe**: Calls the same optimized function as the Optimized test case, but with an additional argument (`getComputedStyle`) that is not used anywhere in the code.

**Pros and Cons**

* Using `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles`/`cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2`:
	+ Pros: May provide a faster execution time due to optimizations made by the author.
	+ Cons: May introduce bugs or side effects if the function is not thoroughly tested.
* Using `getComputedStyle` with the same optimized function:
	+ Pros: May be useful for debugging or testing purposes, as it allows for easy inspection of computed styles.
	+ Cons: The additional argument is not used anywhere in the code and may waste CPU cycles.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark definition includes a script that loads two external JavaScript files. This suggests that the code being measured depends on these external libraries or frameworks.
* The `with getComputedStyle dupe` test case seems to be a duplicate of the Optimized test case, with an additional argument that is not used anywhere in the code.

**Alternatives**

If you wanted to write your own benchmark for this specific scenario, you could consider using a similar approach:

1. Create a script that loads a basic HTML snippet with a single `<div>` element.
2. Define two functions: `cleanUpFontFamilyStyles` and an optimized version (`cleanUpFontFamilyStyles2`) with different implementations (if desired).
3. Use a timing library or tool to measure the execution time of each function, comparing the results for different input scenarios (e.g., varying font sizes, element counts).

Keep in mind that this is just one possible approach, and you may need to adapt it to your specific use case or testing requirements.

Related benchmarks:

CleanUpFontFamilyStyles optimization - use external js file (version: 5)

Comparing performance of: Test 1 vs Optimized vs with getComputedStyle dupe

Created: 9 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Test 1

Optimized

with getComputedStyle dupe

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):