Benchmark: jQuery 223 vs 351

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.3/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq223 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq351 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({
      "background-color": "green"
    })).end().end().remove();
  console.log('tests' + $);
}

Tests:

JQ223
tests($jq223);
JQ351
tests($jq351);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JQ223
JQ351

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of two versions of jQuery, version 223 (`$jq223`) and version 351 (`$jq351`).

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines a function `tests($)`. This function takes a jQuery object `$` as an argument. Inside the function:

1. It selects the `.menu-item` element at index 2 of the unordered list (`<ul>`) and:
	* Sets its closest ancestor's background color to red.
	* Sets its parent element's border to 1px solid blue.
	* Appends a new paragraph element with the text "Text." and sets its background color to green.
	* Removes all elements from the DOM.
2. It logs a message to the console indicating that it has executed.

**Html Preparation Code**

The HTML preparation code includes:

1. Two jQuery scripts: one for version 223 (`$jq223`) and one for version 351 (`$jq351`). Each script calls `$.noConflict(true)` to force the use of the latest version of jQuery.
2. An unordered list (`<ul>`) with four list items, including `.menu-item` elements.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark includes two individual test cases:

1. "JQ223": executes the `tests($jq223)` function.
2. "JQ351": executes the `tests($jq351)` function.

**Library: jQuery**

jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a simplified way to interact with HTML documents. Its primary purpose is to simplify DOM manipulation, event handling, and Ajax requests.

In this benchmark, jQuery is used for:

* Selecting elements (e.g., `.menu-item`)
* Setting CSS properties (e.g., `background-color`)
* Appending elements to the DOM
* Removing elements from the DOM

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

None of the code uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that's not standard. However, it does use a non-standard way of forcing jQuery to use the latest version (`$.noConflict(true)`). This is an older pattern used in some versions of jQuery.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to this benchmark, you might consider:

* Using a different JavaScript library or framework (e.g., vanilla JavaScript, React, Angular)
* Implementing a custom solution using plain JavaScript
* Using a testing framework like Jest or Mocha with a custom test suite

Keep in mind that the choice of alternative will depend on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

jQuery 223 vs 351 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JQ223 vs JQ351

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JQ223

JQ351

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):