Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash isPlainObject vs JS String Type Check
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash isPlainObject vs JS String Type Check
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var sampleObject = { "id": "0001", "type": "donut", "name": "Cake", "ppu": 0.55 }; var isObject;
Tests:
Lodash isPlainObject
isObject = _.isPlainObject(sampleObject);
JS String Type Check
isObject = Object.prototype.toString.call(sampleObject) === '[object Object]';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash isPlainObject
JS String Type Check
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what's being tested. **Test Case Overview** The test case compares two approaches to check if an object in JavaScript is of type `object` or not: 1. **Lodash's `isPlainObject()` method**: This function is part of the popular Lodash library, which provides a set of utility functions for functional programming and data manipulation. 2. **Using `Object.prototype.toString.call(sampleObject) === '[object Object]'`**: This approach uses the built-in `toString()` method of objects in JavaScript to check if an object's prototype chain includes the `Object` constructor. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Lodash's `isPlainObject()` method**: * Pros: Fast and lightweight, as it's a native function in Lodash. * Cons: Requires importing Lodash, which may add overhead depending on the benchmark. 2. **Using `Object.prototype.toString.call(sampleObject) === '[object Object]'`**: * Pros: Built-in function, no additional dependencies required. * Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of calling `toString()` and checking the prototype chain. **Library and Purpose** The Lodash library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for data manipulation, functional programming, and more. In this specific test case, `isPlainObject()` is used to check if an object is plain (i.e., not inherited from another object). **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition that require a deep understanding of JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative ways to check if an object is of type `object`, here are a few options: 1. Using `instanceof Object`: This approach uses the `instanceof` operator to check if an object's prototype chain includes the `Object` constructor. 2. Checking the `constructor` property: You can use the `constructor` property of an object to check its type. 3. Using a custom function: Depending on your specific requirements, you might write a custom function to check if an object is plain. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the two approaches tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Type Check
Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Constructor Check
lodash isobject vs typeof
lodash isobject vs typeof vs toString
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?