Benchmark: Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Constructor Check

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var sampleObject = {
        "id": "0001",
        "type": "donut",
        "name": "Cake",
        "ppu": 0.55
    };
var isObject;

Tests:

Lodash isPlainObject
isObject = _.isPlainObject(sampleObject);
JS Type Check
isObject = sampleObject != null && sampleObject.constructor === Object;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash isPlainObject
JS Type Check

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

JS Type Check

18.7M/s

Lodash isPlainObject

6.7M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ JS Type Check	18,653,834 Ops/sec
Lodash isPlainObject	6,673,132 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark compares two approaches to check if an object is plain in JavaScript:

1. **Lodash `isPlainObject`**: This approach uses the Lodash library, which provides a utility function `isPlainObject()` that checks if an object has the following properties:
	* `__proto__` (a non-null value)
	* `constructor` (a function)
	* `hasOwnProperty` (returns false)
2. **JS Type Check**: This approach uses a simple check to verify if the object is plain:
	* Checks if the object is not null
	* Verifies that its constructor equals the built-in `Object` constructor

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

1. **Lodash `isPlainObject`**:
	* Pros:
		+ More comprehensive check, covering additional properties beyond just `constructor`
		+ Portable across different JavaScript environments
	* Cons:
		+ Requires the Lodash library to be included in the benchmark environment
		+ May incur a small overhead due to the additional function call
2. **JS Type Check**:
	* Pros:
		+ Lightweight and efficient, as it only checks two properties
		+ Does not require any external libraries or dependencies
	* Cons:
		+ Only checks for `constructor === Object`, which may not cover all cases (e.g., objects with a custom constructor that extends `Object`)
		+ May be less accurate than the Lodash approach

**Library and Its Purpose:**

The benchmark uses the Lodash library, which is a popular JavaScript utility library providing a wide range of functions for various tasks, such as:

* Array manipulation
* Object manipulation (e.g., `isPlainObject()`, `cloneDeep()`)
* String manipulation
* Functionality (e.g., `bind()`, `partial()`)

In this benchmark, Lodash is used to provide the `isPlainObject()` function, which helps ensure consistency and accuracy in checking if an object is plain.

**Special JS Features or Syntax:**

This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would impact its results. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines (e.g., V8) have optimized certain aspects of object checks for performance reasons. For example, the `Object.is()` function is used in modern browsers to compare values for equality.

**Alternatives:**

If you were to reimplement this benchmark without using Lodash or a similar library, you could consider implementing your own `isPlainObject()` function that follows a similar approach to the JS Type Check. Alternatively, you could explore other libraries or built-in functions (e.g., `Object.getPrototypeOf()`) for object manipulation and comparison.

Keep in mind that benchmarking JavaScript performance can be complex due to factors like browser-specific optimizations, interpreter caching, and platform dependencies. A thorough understanding of these nuances is essential when designing and interpreting benchmarks.

Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Constructor Check (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Type Check`

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash isPlainObject

JS Type Check

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Constructor Check (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Type Check

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash isPlainObject

JS Type Check

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash isPlainObject vs JS Type Check`