Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object vs Boolean
(version: 0)
Compare between Object and Boolean which is lightest.
Comparing performance of:
Object vs Boolean
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object
const a = {}; console.log(a); console.log(a.b);
Boolean
const b = true; console.log(b);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object
Boolean
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested in the benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches: using an `object` (i.e., an empty object literal `{}`) versus using a `boolean` value (`true`). The goal is to determine which approach is "lightest," likely referring to memory usage or performance. **Comparison Options** There are only two options being compared: 1. **Object**: An empty object literal, `const a = {};`. This creates an instance of the `Object` constructor, which allocates memory for a new object. 2. **Boolean**: A boolean value, `const b = true;`. This simply assigns the value `true` to a constant variable. **Pros and Cons** * **Object (Empty Object Literal)**: + Pros: Can be used as a container or key in other objects. + Cons: Allocates memory for an object instance, which may have performance implications. * **Boolean**: No allocation of memory occurs. It's a simple value that can be stored directly. **Other Considerations** In modern JavaScript engines, the difference between these two approaches is likely to be minimal, and the benchmark is mainly intended to demonstrate the concept of object creation versus simple value assignment. **Library Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries. The code is self-contained and only uses built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code is straightforward and should be easily understandable for most software engineers familiar with JavaScript basics. **Other Alternatives** To measure the memory usage or performance of these two approaches, one could consider using: * **JavaScript Profiler Tools**: Built-in tools like `console.time()` and `console.timeEnd()` can help measure execution times. For memory usage, tools like `memory_profiler` (for Node.js) or Chrome DevTools' Memory Budgets might be used. * **Third-party Libraries**: There are libraries like `benchmark` (a simple benchmarking library for JavaScript), `fast-cmp` (for comparing values), and others that provide more features and flexibility for measuring performance. The `MeasureThat.net` benchmark tool itself uses a web-based interface to measure the execution times of JavaScript code in various browsers, making it an interesting alternative to traditional profiling tools.
Related benchmarks:
Comparing null with ==, ===, and Object.is()
Compare Two Objects
Check object. typeof vs constructor + null check
set.has(key) vs. Boolean(obj[key])
boolean json stringify vs object tostring
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?