Run results for: filter: Native vs Underscore vs Lodash

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:153.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/153.0

Browser: Firefox 153

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one month ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Underscore

3.2M/s

Native

3.1M/s

Lodash

3.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Underscore	3,189,715 Ops/sec
Native	3,141,390 Ops/sec
Lodash	3,084,208 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.8.3/underscore-min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var randomArray = Array.apply(null, Array(100)).map(function() {
	return Math.round(Math.random() * 1000);
});

function isBigEnough (value) {
  return value >= 10
}

// Underscore was loaded last, so this saves an instance of underscore and resets _ to it's previous value (lodash).
var _underscore = _.noConflict();
// This saves an instance of lodash and resets _ to it's previous value (undefined).
var _lodash = _.noConflict();

Tests:

Native
var filtered = randomArray.filter(isBigEnough);
Underscore
var filtered = _underscore.filter(randomArray, isBigEnough);
Lodash
var filtered = _lodash.filter(randomArray, isBigEnough);