Run results for: Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs Object in vs Object[] vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Set.has

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 149

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 2 months ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Set has

90.4M/s

Object in

35.8M/s

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty

24.3M/s

direct

15.8M/s

Array.indexOf

570K/s

Array includes

568K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Set has	90,411,696 Ops/sec
Object in	35,831,996 Ops/sec
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty	24,250,194 Ops/sec
direct	15,757,110 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf	569,693 Ops/sec
Array includes	568,374 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

  var object = {},
      array = [],
      set = new Set(),
      i, test = 1000;
  
  for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
   object['something' + i] = true;
   array.push('something' + i);
   set.add('something' + i);
  }

Tests:

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, 'something' + test)
Object in
('something' + test) in object
Array.indexOf
array.indexOf('something' + test) !== -1
direct
object['something' + test] === true
Array includes
array.includes('something' + test)
Set has
set.has('something' + test)