Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
Native JS: Array.join strings (prepared) vs template literals vs String.concat
find the best solution for concatenate strings
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:152.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/152.0
Browser:
Firefox 152
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 months ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
native concat
32.3M/s
using template literals
161K/s
concat
109K/s
join
87K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
native concat
32,285,664 Ops/sec
using template literals
160,543 Ops/sec
concat
108,663 Ops/sec
join
87,378 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var name = "name"; var id = "id"; var arr = ["", ':', 0, ', ', "", ':', 'name', 0]
Tests:
join
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { arr[0] = id; arr[2] = arr[7] = i; arr[4] = name; let result = arr.join(); }
concat
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { let result = "".concat(id, ':', i, ', ', name, ':', 'name', i); }
using template literals
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { let result = `${id}:${i}, ${name}:name${i}`; }
native concat
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { let result = id + ':'+ i.toString() + ', '+':' +'name'+ i.toString(); }