Run results for: luxon vs datefns vs moment vs dayjs (calculations) new

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/148.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 148

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 months ago

moment

3.3M/s

datefns

1.5M/s

dayjs

650K/s

luxon

641K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ moment	3,343,487 Ops/sec
datefns	1,464,172 Ops/sec
dayjs	649,691 Ops/sec
luxon	640,589 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/dayjs/1.11.7/dayjs.min.js" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/luxon/3.3.0/luxon.min.js"crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.30.1/date_fns.min.js" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.4/moment.min.js" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.__date__ = new Date();
window.__luxon__ = luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(__date__);
window.__moment__ = moment(__date__);
window.__dayjs__ = dayjs(__date__);

Tests:

datefns
dateFns.addYears(__date__, 2);
luxon
__luxon__.plus({ years: 2 });
moment
__moment__.add(2, 'year');
dayjs
__dayjs__.add(2, "year");