Run results for: innerHTML vs append

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/29.0 Chrome/136.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 136

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 5 months ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

innerHTML

679/s

append

261/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ innerHTML	679 Ops/sec
append	261 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="test"></div>

Tests:

append
var newElement = document.createElement("div"); newElement.id = "testing" for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { var newElementPart = document.createElement("div"); newElementPart.classList.add("testClass"); newElement.append(newElementPart); } document.getElementById("test").append(newElement);
innerHTML
html = "<div id='testing'>" for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { html += "<div class='testClass'></div>"; } html += "</div>"; document.getElementById("test").innerHTML = html;