Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
at method versus array index
How does Array.prototype.at() performance compare to traditional indexing (arr[i]).
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=627577" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/146.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome 146
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
3 months ago
Initial value indexing
274K/s
Initial value at()
269K/s
Last value indexing
268K/s
Last value at()
265K/s
Random value indexing
255K/s
Random value at()
252K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Initial value indexing
273,510 Ops/sec
Initial value at()
269,348 Ops/sec
Last value indexing
267,764 Ops/sec
Last value at()
264,538 Ops/sec
Random value indexing
255,432 Ops/sec
Random value at()
252,480 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
arr = Array.from({length: 1000}, (_, i) => i);
Tests:
Initial value indexing
const index_zero = arr[0]; console.log(index_zero);
Random value indexing
const index_random = arr[Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)]; console.log(index_random);
Last value indexing
const index_last = arr[arr.length - 1]; console.log(index_last);
Initial value at()
const at_zero = arr.at(0); console.log(at_zero);
Random value at()
const at_random = arr.at(Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)); console.log(at_random);
Last value at()
const at_last = arr.at(-1); console.log(at_last);