Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
cached Intl.NumberFormat vs new Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString currency loop
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=625252" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0
Browser:
Firefox 147
Operating system:
Ubuntu
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
5 months ago
cached Intl.NumberFormat
40K/s
toLocaleString
873/s
new Intl.NumberFormat
834/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
cached Intl.NumberFormat
39,651 Ops/sec
toLocaleString
873 Ops/sec
new Intl.NumberFormat
834 Ops/sec
Tests:
cached Intl.NumberFormat
window.a = window.a || new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { style: 'decimal', maximumFractionDigits: 2, minimumFractionDigits: 2 }); for (let i = 10000; i< 10100; i++) { window.a.format(i) }
new Intl.NumberFormat
for (let i = 10000; i< 10100; i++) { new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { style: 'decimal', maximumFractionDigits: 2, minimumFractionDigits: 2 }).format(i); }
toLocaleString
for (let i = 10000; i< 10100; i++) { i.toLocaleString('en-US', { style: 'decimal', maximumFractionDigits: 2, minimumFractionDigits: 2 }) }