Run results for: Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs Object in vs Object[] vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Set.has

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/144.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 144

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 7 months ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

direct

11.4M/s

Object in

9.7M/s

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty

8.9M/s

Set has

6.8M/s

Array includes

872K/s

Array.indexOf

870K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ direct	11,409,028 Ops/sec
Object in	9,662,752 Ops/sec
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty	8,946,884 Ops/sec
Set has	6,763,796 Ops/sec
Array includes	872,249 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf	870,426 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

  var object = {},
      array = [],
      set = new Set(),
      i, test = 1000;
  
  for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
   object['something' + i] = true;
   array.push('something' + i);
   set.add('something' + i);
  }

Tests:

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, 'something' + test)
Object in
('something' + test) in object
Array.indexOf
array.indexOf('something' + test) !== -1
direct
object['something' + test] === true
Array includes
array.includes('something' + test)
Set has
set.has('something' + test)