Run results for: ES6 Optional Chaining vs TS Optional Chaining result in javascript vs vs. Lodash _.get

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 26_2_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/143.0.7499.151 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Chrome Mobile iOS 143

Operating system: iOS 26.2.0

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 7 months ago

ES6 Optional Chaining

406.5M/s

TS Optional Chaining result in javascript

117.8M/s

Lodash Get

9.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ ES6 Optional Chaining	406,535,872 Ops/sec
TS Optional Chaining result in javascript	117,831,976 Ops/sec
Lodash Get	9,412,717 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}}
var badObj = {}

Tests:

TS Optional Chaining result in javascript
((_c = (_b = (_a = obj === null || obj === void 0 ? void 0 : obj.a) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.b) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.c) === null || _c === void 0 ? void 0 : _c.d) || 2; ((_f = (_e = (_d = badObj === null || badObj === void 0 ? void 0 : badObj.a) === null || _d === void 0 ? void 0 : _d.b) === null || _e === void 0 ? void 0 : _e.c) === null || _f === void 0 ? void 0 : _f.d) || 2;
Lodash Get
_.get(obj, "a.b.c.d", 2) _.get(badObj, "a.b.c.d", 2)
ES6 Optional Chaining
obj?.a?.b?.c?.d || 2 badObj?.a?.b?.c?.d || 2