Run results for: innerHTML vs cloneNode

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 143

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 6 months ago

Test name	Executions per second
innerHTML	4970.3 Ops/sec
cloneNode	6863.3 Ops/sec

Tests:

innerHTML
const div = document.createElement('div'); div.innerHTML = '<p>FIRMWARE WINDOW</p>'; const modal = document.createElement('div'); let n = 0; while(true) { n++; const cloneText = div.innerHTML; modal.innerHTML = cloneText; if(n===100) break; }
cloneNode
const div = document.createElement('div'); div.innerHTML = '<p>FIRMWARE WINDOW</p>'; const modal = document.createElement('div'); let n = 0; while(true) { n++; const cloneElement = div.cloneNode(true); modal.replaceChildren(cloneElement); if(n===100) break; }