Run results for: Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs Ramda Clone vs rfdc

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:145.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/145.0

Browser: Firefox 145

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 10 months ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

rfdc clone

107.3M/s

Ramda clone

3.2M/s

Lodash cloneDeep

1.5M/s

Json clone

1.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ rfdc clone	107,300,160 Ops/sec
Ramda clone	3,187,524 Ops/sec
Lodash cloneDeep	1,505,276 Ops/sec
Json clone	1,328,059 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/rfdc@1.1.4/index.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
  jayson: {
    stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
    parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
  }
};

var myCopy = null;

Tests:

Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Json clone
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject));
Ramda clone
myCopy = R.clone(MyObject);
rfdc clone
myCopy = rfdc(MyObject);