Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
reduce concat vs flat vs concat spread vs reduce spread
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 EdgA/142.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome Mobile 142
Operating system:
Android
Device Platform:
Mobile
Date tested:
10 months ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
112K/s
concat(...)
107K/s
reduce spread
18K/s
Array.prototype.flat
7K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
112,310 Ops/sec
concat(...)
107,203 Ops/sec
reduce spread
17,501 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.flat
6,802 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var params = [ [1, 2], ["hello", true, 7], Array(10000).fill(4), ];
Tests:
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
const x = params.reduce((acc, val) => acc.concat(val), []);
Array.prototype.flat
const x = params.flat(1);
concat(...)
const x = [].concat(...params)
reduce spread
const x = params.reduce((acc, val) => [...acc, ...val], []);