Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
cached Intl.NumberFormat vs new Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString currency loop
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=618224" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 140
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
10 months ago
cached Intl.NumberFormat
25K/s
toLocaleString
605/s
new Intl.NumberFormat
560/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
cached Intl.NumberFormat
25,138 Ops/sec
toLocaleString
605 Ops/sec
new Intl.NumberFormat
560 Ops/sec
Tests:
cached Intl.NumberFormat
window.a = window.a || new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { style: 'decimal', maximumFractionDigits: 2, minimumFractionDigits: 2 }); for (let i = 10000; i< 10100; i++) { window.a.format(i) }
new Intl.NumberFormat
for (let i = 10000; i< 10100; i++) { new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { style: 'decimal', maximumFractionDigits: 2, minimumFractionDigits: 2 }).format(i); }
toLocaleString
for (let i = 10000; i< 10100; i++) { i.toLocaleString('en-US', { style: 'decimal', maximumFractionDigits: 2, minimumFractionDigits: 2 }) }