Run results for: for with continue vs for over a .filter (v2)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 140

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 10 months ago

for with continue

14.4M/s

for with .filter

6.7M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ for with continue	14,358,773 Ops/sec
for with .filter	6,749,286 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const array = new Array(100).fill(1).map((_,index) =>index)

Tests:

for with continue
let sum = 0 for (const el of array){ if (el % 2 !== 0) continue; sum =+ el; }
for with .filter
let sum = 0 for (const el of array.filter(x => x % 2 === 0)){ sum =+ el }