Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
reduce concat vs flat vs concat spread vs reduce spread
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 140
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
concat(...)
644K/s
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
574K/s
reduce spread
32K/s
Array.prototype.flat
13K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
concat(...)
644,168 Ops/sec
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
573,965 Ops/sec
reduce spread
32,462 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.flat
13,055 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var params = [ [1, 2], ["hello", true, 7], Array(10000).fill(4), ];
Tests:
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
const x = params.reduce((acc, val) => acc.concat(val), []);
Array.prototype.flat
const x = params.flat(1);
concat(...)
const x = [].concat(...params)
reduce spread
const x = params.reduce((acc, val) => [...acc, ...val], []);