Run results for: RegEx.test vs. array .includes

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 139

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

String.includes

9.1M/s

RegEx.test

5.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes	9,121,638 Ops/sec
RegEx.test	5,321,341 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var list = ["Hello", 'world', 'hello1', 'world1', 'hello2', 'world2', 'hello3', 'world3'];
var regex = /Hello|world|hello1|world1|hello2|world2|hello3|world3/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test('Hello'); regex.test('hello2'); regex.test('world3');
String.includes
list.includes("Hello"); list.includes("hello2"); list.includes("world3");