Run results for: Canvas roundrect vs fillrect perf

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/122.0.0.0 (Edition developer)

Browser: Opera 122

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

roundRect

1.9M/s

fillRect

1.2M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ roundRect	1,916,488 Ops/sec
fillRect	1,214,754 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<canvas id="canvas1" width="512" height="512"></canvas>

<style>
 canvas { border: 1px solid black; }
</style>

<script>
var canvas = document.getElementById('canvas1');
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');

</script>

Tests:

roundRect
ctx.beginPath() ctx.roundRect(ctx, 10, 10, 200, 100, 20) ctx.fill()
fillRect
ctx.fillRect(10, 10, 200, 100)

Run results for: Canvas roundrect vs fillrect perf

Finding the performance difference between the new "roundrect" method and fillrect

roundRect

fillRect