Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
sum for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for with cached length
Compare loop performance doing summation
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 138
Operating system:
Linux
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
for with cached length
6.6M/s
for
4.9M/s
for..of
4.3M/s
foreach
3.8M/s
some
3.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
for with cached length
6,645,368 Ops/sec
for
4,947,944 Ops/sec
for..of
4,279,566 Ops/sec
foreach
3,822,214 Ops/sec
some
3,799,700 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(100); for (let i = 0, end = array.length; i < end; i += 1) { array[i] = i; }
Tests:
for
let sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i += 1) { sum += array[i]; }
foreach
let sum = 0; array.forEach(function(i) { sum += array[i]; });
some
let sum = 0; array.some(function(i) { sum += array[i]; });
for..of
let sum = 0; for (var i of array) { sum += array[i]; }
for with cached length
let sum = 0; for (var i = 0, end = array.length; i < end; i += 1) { sum += array[i]; }