Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
sum for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for with cached length
Compare loop performance doing summation
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser:
Firefox 140
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
for with cached length
12.9M/s
for
12.4M/s
foreach
4.8M/s
for..of
1.5M/s
some
1.0M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
for with cached length
12,889,958 Ops/sec
for
12,381,713 Ops/sec
foreach
4,763,884 Ops/sec
for..of
1,491,781 Ops/sec
some
1,021,714 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(100); for (let i = 0, end = array.length; i < end; i += 1) { array[i] = i; }
Tests:
for
let sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i += 1) { sum += array[i]; }
foreach
let sum = 0; array.forEach(function(i) { sum += array[i]; });
some
let sum = 0; array.some(function(i) { sum += array[i]; });
for..of
let sum = 0; for (var i of array) { sum += array[i]; }
for with cached length
let sum = 0; for (var i = 0, end = array.length; i < end; i += 1) { sum += array[i]; }