Run results for: traditional string concat vs template string concat + array join

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 136

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

template string concat

61.1M/s

Array join

3.8M/s

traditional string concat

13K/s

View exact numbers

Script Preparation code:

const a = Math.random();
const b = Math.random();
const c = Math.random();
const d = Math.random();

const arr = [a, b, c, d];

Tests:

traditional string concat
let str = ''; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { str = a + ',' + b + ',' + c + ',' + d }
template string concat
const str = `${a},${b},${c}${d}`;
Array join
const str = arr.join(",")