Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=613093" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:139.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/139.0
Browser:
Firefox 139
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
String.includes
1241.4M/s
RegEx.test
32.7M/s
String.match
17.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
1,241,444,608 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
32,719,508 Ops/sec
String.match
17,298,470 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");