Run results for: createContextualFragment vs InnerHtml

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 138

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

InnerHtml

80/s

createContextualFragment

49/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ InnerHtml	80 Ops/sec
createContextualFragment	49 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var str = `<div>${Math.random().toString().slice(2)}</div>`;
var range = document.createRange();
var temp = document.createElement('template')
var res = '';
for(i=0; i<30000; i++){
	res += str
}

Tests:

createContextualFragment
var t1 = new Date().now var test1 = range.createContextualFragment(res)
InnerHtml
temp.innerHTML = res var test2 = temp.content