Run results for: forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 16_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.5 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Mobile Safari 16

Operating system: iOS 16.5

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

forEach

18K/s

for

15K/s

reduce

15K/s

map

11K/s

filter

11K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ forEach	18,290 Ops/sec
for	15,364 Ops/sec
reduce	15,335 Ops/sec
map	11,498 Ops/sec
filter	11,183 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 12345; i++) {
  arr[i] = i;
}

function someFn(i) {
  return (i * 3 * 8 / 1200 * 0.002 / 40 * 0.2);
}

var sumForEach = 0,
  sumReduce = 0,
  sumMap = 0,
  sumFilter = 0,
  sumFor = 0;

Tests:

forEach
arr.forEach(item => sumForEach += someFn(item));
reduce
sumReduce = arr.reduce((lastValue, item) => { return sumReduce += someFn(item); });
map
arr.map(item => (sumMap += someFn(item)));
filter
arr.filter(item => (sumFilter += someFn(item)));
for
for (var j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) { sumFor += arr[j]; }