Run results for: Classnames vs CLSX vs light-classnames

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser: Firefox 136

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

light-classnames

2.4M/s

classnames

1.7M/s

clsx

1.7M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ light-classnames	2,443,254 Ops/sec
classnames	1,732,071 Ops/sec
clsx	1,722,454 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:


<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.2.6/index.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.1.0/dist/clsx.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/light-classnames@0.0.3/dist/bundle.umd.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var str = 'style';
var obj = {
 	 'style-2': true,
  	 'style-3': false,
 	 'style-4': 9,
  	 'style-5': null
};
var number = 6;
var anotherStr = 'jigucha';
var moreObject = {a: undefined, b: 'asdf'}

Tests:

classnames
let result = window.classNames(str, obj, number, undefined, anotherStr, null, 0, moreObject)
clsx
let result = window.clsx(str, obj, number, undefined, anotherStr, null, 0, moreObject)
light-classnames
let result = window.lcn(str, obj, number, undefined, anotherStr, null, 0, moreObject)

Run results for: Classnames vs CLSX vs light-classnames

In doing my new package light-classnames. I'm trying to see if my package is faster than the other two major competitors/

classnames

clsx

light-classnames