Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
array.includes vs set.has on 100 elements
100 elements and each element check once
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=610830" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Chrome 137
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
10 months ago
Test name
Executions per second
array.includes
537828.6 Ops/sec
set.has
3747478.2 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
const arr = []; const elementsCount = 100; for (let i = 0; i < elementsCount; i++) { arr.push(i); }; const set = new Set(arr);
Tests:
array.includes
for (let i = 0; i < elementsCount; i++) { arr.includes(i); };
set.has
for (let i = 0; i < elementsCount; i++) { set.has(i); };