Run results for: fill array with value: map(callback) vs fill(value)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 137

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

.map(callback) - 1 000 elements

890K/s

.fill(value) - 1 000 elements

673K/s

.map(callback) - 10 000 elements

83K/s

.fill(value) - 10 000 elements

65K/s

.fill(value) - 100 000 elements

4K/s

.map(callback) - 100 000 elements

4K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ .map(callback) - 1 000 elements	890,263 Ops/sec
.fill(value) - 1 000 elements	673,165 Ops/sec
.map(callback) - 10 000 elements	82,659 Ops/sec
.fill(value) - 10 000 elements	65,226 Ops/sec
.fill(value) - 100 000 elements	3,868 Ops/sec
.map(callback) - 100 000 elements	3,514 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var array1000 = (new Array(1000)).map((e, i) => ({a: i, b: i, c: i, d: i, e: i, f: i, g: i, test: 'object'+ i}));
var array10000 = (new Array(10000)).map((e, i) => ({a: i, b: i, c: i, d: i, e: i, f: i, g: i, test: 'object'+ i}));
var array100000 = (new Array(100000)).map((e, i) => ({a: i, b: i, c: i, d: i, e: i, f: i, g: i, test: 'object'+ i}));

Tests:

.map(callback) - 1 000 elements
const result = array1000.map(() => true);
.fill(value) - 1 000 elements
const result = new Array(array1000.length).fill(true);
.map(callback) - 10 000 elements
const result = array10000.map(() => true);
.fill(value) - 10 000 elements
const result = new Array(array10000.length).fill(true);
.map(callback) - 100 000 elements
const result = array100000.map(() => true);
.fill(value) - 100 000 elements
const result = new Array(array100000.length).fill(true);