Run results for: innerHTML vs cloneNode

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/136.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 136

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 11 months ago

Test name	Executions per second
innerHTML	13657.2 Ops/sec
cloneNode	18547.6 Ops/sec

Tests:

innerHTML
const div = document.createElement('div'); div.innerHTML = '<p>FIRMWARE WINDOW</p>'; const modal = document.createElement('div'); let n = 0; while(true) { n++; const cloneText = div.innerHTML; modal.innerHTML = cloneText; if(n===100) break; }
cloneNode
const div = document.createElement('div'); div.innerHTML = '<p>FIRMWARE WINDOW</p>'; const modal = document.createElement('div'); let n = 0; while(true) { n++; const cloneElement = div.cloneNode(true); modal.replaceChildren(cloneElement); if(n===100) break; }