Run results for: startsWith vs include vs substring

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:139.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/139.0

Browser: Firefox 139

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

JS startsWith

3K/s

JS includes

3K/s

JS substring

2K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ JS startsWith	3,307 Ops/sec
JS includes	3,253 Ops/sec
JS substring	1,673 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

window.prefix = "%%SOME_PREFIX%%";
const possible = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

function makeRandomString(len) {
  var text = "";
  for( var i=0; i < len; i++ ) {
    text += possible.charAt(getRandomInt(possible.length));
  }
  return text;
}

window.allStrings = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
	allStrings.push(window.prefix + makeRandomString(1000));
	allStrings.push(makeRandomString(1000));
}

Tests:

JS startsWith
window.allStrings.forEach(s => { s.startsWith(window.prefix); })
JS includes
window.allStrings.forEach(s => { s.includes(window.prefix); })
JS substring
window.allStrings.forEach(s => { s.substring(0, window.prefix.length) === window.prefix; })