Run results for: lodash fp vs lodash vs vanilla vs ramda

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0

Browser: Firefox 138

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

Vanilla

42K/s

Lodash

37K/s

Lodash FP

36K/s

Ramda

31K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Vanilla	41,964 Ops/sec
Lodash	37,040 Ops/sec
Lodash FP	35,866 Ops/sec
Ramda	31,076 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)'></script>
<script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/ramda@0.25.0/dist/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array =  [...Array(6000)].fill('l')
var reducer = (r, x) => r + x

// Use `noConflict` to restore the pre-fp variant.
var fp = _.noConflict();

Tests:

Lodash
_.reduce(array, reducer, 0);
Lodash FP
fp.reduce(reducer, 0)(array)
Vanilla
array.reduce(reducer, 0)
Ramda
R.reduce(reducer, 0, array)