Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/135.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 135

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Benchmark engine: Benchmark.js

String.includes

113.4M/s

RegEx.test

36.7M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ String.includes	113,370,416 Ops/sec
RegEx.test	36,705,036 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /hello/i;

Tests: