Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
reduce concat vs flat vs concat spread vs reduce spread
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0
Browser:
Firefox 136
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
121K/s
concat(...)
120K/s
Array.prototype.flat
11K/s
reduce spread
11K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
121,105 Ops/sec
concat(...)
120,132 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.flat
11,417 Ops/sec
reduce spread
10,539 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var params = [ [1, 2], ["hello", true, 7], Array(10000).fill(4), ];
Tests:
reduce + Array.prototype.concat
const x = params.reduce((acc, val) => acc.concat(val), []);
Array.prototype.flat
const x = params.flat(1);
concat(...)
const x = [].concat(...params)
reduce spread
const x = params.reduce((acc, val) => [...acc, ...val], []);